Michael Miller’s glaze and design – Part 3

This is the third post focused on focused on my new glazes and work. Read part 1 and part 2, too.

When I try a published glaze I experiment on different clay bodies, and in different areas of the kiln. I then refine the recipe over the course of many firings until satisfied. The same, of course, goes for my own glaze creations, though mine are more experimental and may never, ever, turn out. I’ll write more about experimentation in a later post… I’m covering my glazing process for now.

I spray glazes over each other to varying degrees and thicknesses to obtain more color variation. Sometimes this is beautiful- sometimes hideous. Clay body, firing temperature, glaze thickness, reduction schedule (the temperature at onset of reduction, strength and length of reduction), and local material variations all affect glaze color.

Glaze thickness has a huge effect on color. Too thin and the glaze doesn’t develop good color, too thick and it can run or be a poor color. The same glaze needs to be thin on porcelain, slightly thicker on white stoneware, and thicker still on brown stoneware to develop the desired color. Some glazes are beautiful on porcelain, and terrible on brown stoneware.

Clay shrinks when fired. Bad glaze “fit” (making sure the glaze shrinks at the same rate and overall shrinkage as the clay) for a given clay body can cause crazing, crawling, or shivering. One must consider physics and thermodynamics in addition to coloration and texture.

Any glazes with rutile as a component are more prone to pinholing as a glaze defect. We have had entire kilns of our work go straight to the dumpster when these defects crop up. In the early 90s when I was trying to perfect a rutile blue we fired twice a week and went months without a success. Perhaps it’s contempt, but I’m no longer excited about rutile blue.

Now I fire a glaze firing every 2 or 3 weeks, and try to do some glaze tests in each. We are constantly learning and adding to our color palette. The somewhat frustrating and humbling part of being a potter is that once you give a piece up to the fire, anything can happen.

Right now I’m working on a custom set of dinnerware for a client with my sprayed glazing (see us unload it at 5 minutes, 57 seconds in to episode 3 of the Kiln Room). The dinner and lunch plates and large salad bowl are perfect. The pasta bowls and cereal bowls have pinholing on 60% of the pieces. Three bowls were fired on the same shelf – two of the three are pinholed. One is flawless. Why?

I really have no clue at the moment why this happened, but yesterday I threw ten more pasta bowls and 16 more cereal bowls to meet the order. You’d think after 40+ years I’d have this figured out, but it just doesn’t work that way.

We were at a 60th birthday party for a potter friend of ours a couple months ago with 6 potters with 35+ years experience each. We had this very discussion of how the kiln will throw you a curve every time you think you have the process down pat.

After all these years I still have only a tiny piece of the puzzle worked out.

2 Responses to “Michael Miller’s glaze and design – Part 3”

  1. Thank you for confirming that it can be frustrating no matter how long a person has been working with clay and glazes. I’m not as experienced as you, so that’s whats nice to know, it’s not just me.

  2. my peers in pottery class tease me for my self-diagnosis of “glaze anxiety.”

Leave a Reply